A Wave of Revenge Attacks in China: A Cry for Deeper Societal Reforms?

Tragedy in Zhuhai, China

In just nine days, China has witnessed a chilling sequence of mass casualty incidents that have left communities reeling and experts questioning the country’s underlying societal stresses. Analysts caution against dismissing these events as isolated acts of troubled individuals, pointing instead to broader systemic issues demanding urgent attention.

The most recent tragedy unfolded on Tuesday, November 19, in Changde, Hunan Province, where an SUV plowed through a crowd outside a primary school. Frantic scenes of children fleeing in terror were captured on social media before the posts were swiftly taken down. While the motives and exact number of casualties in this incident remain unclear, it marked the third major attack in less than two weeks.

On November 11, a 62-year-old man in Zhuhai drove a vehicle into a sports stadium, killing 35 people who were exercising there. Days later, in Yixing, a 21-year-old man unleashed a stabbing rampage at a vocational college, leaving eight dead and 17 injured. Police have since linked these two earlier attacks to personal grievances: dissatisfaction with a divorce settlement in Zhuhai and frustrations over academic failure in Yixing.

Though China’s overall violent crime rate remains relatively low—0.46 murders per 100,000 people in 2023 compared to 5.7 in the United States—the clustering of such high-profile attacks has raised alarm. These recent incidents join a string of others this year, including stabbings in Shanghai and Beijing.

Social media platforms in China were inundated with expressions of shock and anger before censors intervened to remove critical posts. On Weibo, one user reacted to the Zhuhai car attack with: “Why are such incidents happening every day?” Another on Douyin (China’s TikTok) declared, “The world is crazy.”

Experts describe a shared characteristic among these tragedies: a sense of “social revenge.” Dr. Zhao Litao, a senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore, noted, “Perpetrators act on personal grievances by attacking strangers, highlighting the indiscriminate targeting and unpredictability involved.”

In Zhuhai, the attacker reportedly acted out of frustration over a contentious divorce settlement. After the rampage, he attempted suicide and is now in a coma. The Yixing assailant, a vocational college student, had failed an exam and was denied his graduation certificate. Police also revealed his dissatisfaction with low internship pay.

Such episodes reveal how unresolved personal grievances, when compounded by societal pressures, can escalate into extreme violence. Barclay Bram, a fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, emphasized that the perpetrators’ inability to access effective coping mechanisms, coupled with the “social contagion effect” of previous mass violence incidents, can trigger catastrophic outcomes.

China is grappling with mounting social and economic pressures, from a slowing economy and a persistent property crisis to high youth unemployment. These stressors are further exacerbated by the long tail of the COVID-19 pandemic, during which harsh lockdowns and perceived government overreach eroded public trust.

Mental health remains an under-addressed issue in China. The Blue Book of National Depression (2022) reported that only 20 people per million in China have access to proper mental health services, compared to 1,000 per million in the United States. Dr. Jared Ng, Medical Director of Connections MindHealth, highlighted that mental health resources are disproportionately concentrated in urban centers, leaving rural communities underserved.

“Stigma also plays a significant role,” Dr. Ng said. “Many people suffer in silence or keep their struggles within the family due to societal judgment.”

Experts like Dr. Zhao argue that these issues stem from structural deficiencies. “Socioeconomic disparities, weakened social norms, and insufficient psychological support exacerbate stress levels, pushing individuals to their breaking point,” he said.

In response to these tragedies, Chinese authorities have tightened their grip on public discourse. Graphic images from the Zhuhai incident and critical posts questioning the government’s role were swiftly scrubbed from platforms like Weibo and Douyin. A post about the Changde attack, which initially attracted over 4,000 comments, showed fewer than 80 the following day.

This censorship has drawn criticism. “The government’s approach focuses more on controlling narratives rather than addressing root causes,” said Dr. Zhao. Associate Professor Alfred Wu from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy echoed this sentiment, suggesting that Beijing’s top-down governance model struggles to manage localized grievances effectively.

However, some netizens support limited reporting on violent incidents to prevent copycat attacks. “With 1.4 billion people, there are bound to be extremists,” commented a Xiaohongshu user, arguing against sensationalizing such events.

Experts agree that immediate measures like enhanced surveillance and risk mapping can mitigate threats but stress that sustainable solutions lie in addressing the root causes of societal discontent.

  • Equitable Economic Policies: Alleviating economic disparities through job creation and fair wage practices can reduce financial stress.
  • Robust Social Safety Nets: Expanding access to mental health services, especially in rural areas, and ensuring fair dispute resolution mechanisms can offer struggling individuals a lifeline.
  • Cultural Shifts: Promoting mental health awareness and reducing stigma around seeking help are crucial for early intervention.
  • Community-Based Initiatives: Encouraging grassroots-level solutions can foster social cohesion and address localized grievances effectively.

Dr. Zhao urged policymakers to focus on building a society where people feel secure, supported, and hopeful. “It’s critical to understand how individuals transition from normalcy to extremity and address the environmental or systemic conditions facilitating this shift.”

These incidents have sparked introspection among both experts and the public about the fragility of societal harmony in a rapidly modernizing China. While economic growth remains a priority, analysts warn that ignoring the human cost—manifested in stress, mental health crises, and growing dissatisfaction—could lead to more frequent and severe disruptions.

As the country mourns the victims of these attacks, the challenge for China’s leaders is clear: to bridge the gaps in economic equality, social support, and mental health care while ensuring that grievances are heard and addressed before they escalate into violence. In doing so, China could transform these tragedies into a turning point for societal reform.

Related Posts