In a dramatic escalation of aerial rivalry in South Asia, Pakistan has claimed to have downed five Indian fighter jets—including the Indian Air Force’s prized Rafale jets—using its recently inducted Chinese-origin J-10C fighters. The announcement, delivered by Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar before Pakistan’s National Assembly, sparked a firestorm of speculation, nationalistic fervor, and international concern, yet remains unsupported by verifiable evidence.
The claims came on the heels of India’s supposed launch of “Operation Sindoor,” a retaliatory strike targeting terror training camps across the Pakistani border in response to the deadly Pahalgam attack. Pakistan asserts that during this brief but intense encounter, the J-10C demonstrated its prowess by taking down a combination of Rafale and other Indian aircraft, though no official confirmation from the Indian side has been issued.
The sudden eruption of narratives—particularly on social media and in Chinese state-backed outlets—has raised more questions than answers. Has a new chapter of aerial warfare truly begun in South Asia, or are we witnessing a coordinated attempt at information warfare by regional actors?
Speaking in Parliament, Ishaq Dar confidently proclaimed that Pakistan’s J-10C fighters had neutralized five Indian aircraft, three of them Rafales, citing prior intelligence and a calculated response: “There were instructions to only target Indian jets that released payloads. This is why only five jets were taken down. Had the directive been different, nearly 10–12 jets would have been struck.”
Dar’s remarks gained unprecedented amplification by Chinese state-owned Global Times (GT), which published an extensive report on May 7, boldly reiterating Pakistan’s version of events. Chinese military blogs and outlets like Sohu also joined the fray, with some going as far as to claim that six Indian Rafales were shot down using electronic warfare to first blind the jets before engagement.
This enthusiastic endorsement is not surprising. China’s strategic and military partnership with Pakistan has long been a cornerstone of Beijing’s South Asia policy. From the co-development of the JF-17 fighter jet to large-scale economic projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the two countries share a mutually reinforcing alliance.
By elevating these claims—true or not—China gains multiple advantages. Not only does it boost the image of its homegrown J-10C aircraft on the international arms market, but it also simultaneously applies psychological pressure on India.
At the heart of this debate is the apparent performance comparison between the J-10C and the Rafale. The Chengdu J-10C is a 4.5-generation fighter equipped with Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar and long-range PL-15E missiles. Pakistan’s Air Force inducted these fighters in 2022, explicitly presenting them as a counter to India’s Rafale fleet.
Chinese media and defense commentators have argued that the J-10C’s radar and missile suite gave it the upper hand in the alleged engagement. According to them, the PL-15E’s 150-kilometer range combined with the J-10C’s radar capabilities allowed Pakistan to strike Indian aircraft in Beyond Visual Range (BVR) combat.
However, these claims clash with open-source assessments. The Rafale, equipped with the French RBE2 AESA radar, reportedly offers superior detection range—upwards of 200–240 kilometers—compared to the J-10C’s estimated 120–200 kilometers. Moreover, the Rafale’s Meteor missile, which has a no-escape zone far exceeding that of the PL-15E, could pose a significant challenge in BVR engagements.
Thus, while the J-10C is a formidable platform, the narrative of its decisive superiority over the Rafale appears exaggerated at best, and politically motivated at worst.
The most explosive component of Pakistan’s claim is the alleged destruction of multiple Rafale fighters. In particular, photos of aircraft wreckage shared online, allegedly from Bathinda, Punjab, were pointed to as evidence of a downed Rafale with serial number 001—India’s first Rafale jet.
However, a closer investigation unraveled this narrative. Analysts quickly identified that the image in circulation first appeared online in September 2024. Furthermore, the Indian government and Air Force have neither confirmed the loss of any aircraft nor acknowledged any operational mishaps around that time.
Even a French intelligence official’s anonymous quote to CNN, indicating that a Rafale might have been shot down, failed to hold weight. No supporting data, such as radar logs, crash-site imagery, or pilot accounts, have emerged.
If a Rafale had indeed been downed, it would mark a historic first: no Rafale jet has ever been lost in combat. Moreover, it would represent the first combat loss for the Indian Air Force since the 2019 Balakot incident, when a MiG-21 was shot down during a brief skirmish with Pakistani jets.
China has capitalized on the episode to market its military-industrial complex. Following the wave of speculation and media coverage, shares of AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Co. Ltd., the J-10C manufacturer, rallied over 36% in two days. Meanwhile, Dassault Aviation, maker of the Rafale, saw its stock fall by up to 5%.
This PR coup is not coincidental. China has long sought to export the J-10C to a broader audience. Uzbekistan, for instance, is currently evaluating the J-10C alongside the Rafale for its air force. Egypt, too, has expressed interest in the platform. With rising geopolitical tensions, China is leveraging such conflicts to advertise its defense wares in real-time.
Prominent Chinese commentators like Shen Shiwei and Hu Shisheng have actively promoted the J-10C’s role in this incident, reinforcing the idea of Chinese defense systems outperforming Western counterparts. This plays well into Beijing’s narrative of breaking Western technological hegemony.
India’s measured response—or lack thereof—has fueled conspiracy theories. Neither the Indian Ministry of Defence nor the Indian Air Force has issued a statement on the claims. Indian defense analysts, however, have uniformly dismissed them as “baseless” and “propaganda.”
Pravin Sawhney, a defense analyst, tweeted that the story bears the hallmarks of an information warfare operation aimed at bolstering Pakistan’s and China’s strategic credibility. He noted that without telemetry data, cockpit recordings, or satellite imagery, the Pakistani claims do not meet the burden of proof.
The Indian Press Information Bureau (PIB) has also refuted other viral posts showing wreckage of a MiG-29, clarifying that the footage dated back to September 2024 when an aircraft crashed in Rajasthan due to technical failure.
\
The internet has become a powerful tool in shaping modern warfare narratives. Pakistan’s claim has been disseminated and dissected on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and TikTok. Numerous accounts have circulated pictures and videos purportedly showing aircraft wreckage, downed missiles, or even captured Indian pilots—all of which remain unverified.
One video allegedly shows the remnants of a missile believed to be the Chinese-origin PL-15E in India’s Hoshiarpur region. While the missile’s presence could suggest a Pakistani strike, it does not confirm a successful hit. There is also no evidence linking the missile wreckage to a specific aerial engagement.
This fog of war is emblematic of a new battlefield—one where digital perception can shape geopolitical narratives more quickly than facts.
If these claims are proven false, Pakistan and China could face significant credibility losses on the international stage. If verified, however, the incident would dramatically alter the regional military balance and spark a reassessment of air combat doctrines across South Asia.
For India, any confirmed loss—particularly of a Rafale—would accelerate demands for fleet upgrades, acquisition of stealth fighters like the American F-35, and renewed investment in indigenous programs like the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA).
For China, successful engagement by the J-10C would serve as a global marketing victory, opening doors to arms deals across Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
For Pakistan, it would be a morale-boosting milestone, offering validation of its procurement strategy and doctrinal shift toward Chinese platforms.
As of now, the absence of concrete evidence keeps the episode firmly in the realm of contested claims. The truth may lie buried beneath political agendas, military secrecy, and digital noise—but the implications are real and unfolding.
