Moscow and New Delhi are locked in high-stakes negotiations to accelerate and expand deliveries of the Russian-made S-400 Triumf surface-to-air missile systems, in a move that could decisively tilt the airpower balance in South Asia.
“India already has our S-400 system,” Russian state news agency TASS quoted Dmitry Shugayev, head of Russia’s Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation.
“There is potential to expand our cooperation in this area as well. That means new deliveries. For now, we are in the negotiation stage,” Shugayev added.
India first signed a landmark USD 5.5 billion agreement in 2018 for five S-400 systems, aimed squarely at countering threats from both China and Pakistan. The deal was widely viewed as one of the most significant arms acquisitions in India’s modern history, cementing Russia’s role as a key pillar in New Delhi’s defence strategy.
Delays, partly due to the pandemic and partly due to Russia’s war in Ukraine, have hampered the original delivery schedule. Moscow is currently expected to hand over the final two batteries in 2026 and 2027. Now, however, that timeline appears set to be accelerated following the latest round of talks.
The renewed push underscores Russia’s enduring role as India’s principal arms supplier. Between 2020 and 2024, Moscow accounted for 36% of Indian arms imports, followed closely by France at 33% and Israel at 13%.
Despite India’s diversification efforts — buying Rafale fighters from France, Barak-8 missiles from Israel, and indigenous Akash systems — Russia remains New Delhi’s most trusted partner in strategic defence platforms.
That trust was again visible at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in China, where Prime Minister Narendra Modi reinforced India’s alignment with Moscow, telling Russian President Vladimir Putin that India and Russia “stood side by side even in difficult times.”
Putin, in turn, referred to Modi as his “dear friend,” a signal that beyond the optics of diplomacy, Moscow views New Delhi as a cornerstone for its influence in South Asia — especially as Russia grows increasingly isolated from the West.
This diplomatic warmth is anchored in realpolitik: India continues to rely on Russian strategic systems like the S-400 not only for deterrence, but for its very survival in a two-front conflict scenario.
The S-400 Triumf (NATO reporting name: SA-21 Growler) is widely considered among the world’s most advanced integrated air defence systems. Designed by Almaz-Antey and entering service in 2007, it has been exported to China, India, and Turkey, while others continue to express interest despite the risk of U.S. sanctions under CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act).
Unlike conventional surface-to-air systems, the S-400 is not just a tactical air defence asset — it is a strategic deterrent. By creating what military planners call an anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) bubble, the S-400 denies adversary air forces the freedom to operate within hundreds of kilometres of its coverage zone.
Each S-400 regiment typically comprises:
-
Command Post (55K6E): Advanced battle management system mounted on a Ural-532301 truck.
-
Radar Suite:
-
91N6E Big Bird for long-range surveillance (600 km).
-
92N6E Grave Stone engagement radar, guiding 72 missiles against 36 targets.
-
96L6E Cheese Board all-altitude radar for high-angle threats.
-
-
Launchers (5P85TE2/SE2): Mobile TELs, each carrying four missile tubes.
-
Support Equipment: Power supply, reload vehicles, mast systems for elevated radar operation.
Mobility is another advantage: the system can be deployed within 5–10 minutes, making it extremely difficult to destroy in a pre-emptive strike.
The S-400’s layered missile family makes it versatile:
-
40N6E (Ultra-Long Range): 400 km reach, Mach 14, designed to take out AWACS, bombers, and ballistic missiles.
-
48N6DM (Long Range): 250 km reach, Mach 7.5, capable against fighters, cruise missiles, and UAVs.
-
9M96E2 (Medium Range): 120 km, high agility, hit-to-kill capability.
-
9M96E (Short Range): 40 km, designed for drones and precision-guided munitions.
This missile diversity allows the S-400 to simultaneously engage stealth fighters, ballistic missiles, hypersonic cruise weapons, and UAV swarms.
India’s S-400 has not only been deployed but battle-tested. During Operation Sindoor, a high-intensity conflict with Pakistan, the system played a decisive role.
Air Chief Marshal A. P. Singh revealed that S-400 batteries destroyed five Pakistani fighter jets and one AEW&C/ELINT aircraft, preventing glide bomb strikes on critical infrastructure.
“The S-400 system, which we had recently bought, has been a game-changer,” Singh declared. “Their glide bombs were neutralized because they could not penetrate the system.”
Singh added that the system intercepted a target at nearly 300 kilometres, marking the longest confirmed surface-to-air kill in military history. The engagement forced Pakistan Air Force fighters into standoff ranges, degrading their offensive capabilities.
India’s deployment of the S-400 is aimed at a two-front challenge:
-
Against China: Beijing’s J-20 stealth fighters, J-16 strike jets, and hypersonic DF-17 missiles now face a dense radar and missile shield along the Line of Actual Control. Long-range intercepts complicate China’s doctrine of rapid penetration.
-
Against Pakistan: Islamabad’s new J-10C fighters, armed with the PL-15 BVR missile (200–300 km range), are meant to offset India’s S-400 edge. But India’s radar redundancy allows it to detect and intercept even standoff strikes.
This dual-front deterrence is calibrated to prevent escalation while providing India breathing room for counter-strikes. For adversaries, offensive air penetration becomes slower, costlier, and riskier.
Beyond the S-400, India has quietly signalled interest in the S-500 Prometheus, Russia’s most advanced system, capable of intercepting ballistic missiles and satellites in low-earth orbit.
The S-500, formally known as the 55R6M Triumfator-M, represents a generational leap, pushing Russia into the same league as the U.S. THAAD and Aegis BMD.
Its interceptors can reportedly hit targets at 600 km and altitudes of 200 km, extending defences into near-space. However, analysts caution that Moscow may not release the system to India anytime soon.
“India’s ambition to acquire the S-500 would hinge on approval from Russia’s top leadership,” a regional defence expert told this publication. “Given its intimate link to Russia’s nuclear command-and-control, the S-500 remains tightly guarded. India may have to wait years, if not decades.”
The accelerated expansion of India’s S-400 fleet has wide-ranging consequences:
-
For Pakistan: Strike doctrines relying on F-16s, JF-17s, and J-10Cs will require heavier electronic warfare and decoy packages. Glide bombs must now be launched from farther away, reducing accuracy. SEAD/DEAD missions will become costlier and riskier.
-
For China: India’s layered shield forces Beijing to invest in cyber warfare, massed cruise salvos, and hypersonic strikes to erode Indian defences. The PLAAF’s J-20 stealth jets may lose part of their edge under multi-band radar coverage.
-
For the Region: A dense S-400/S-500 grid could deter adversaries but also raise instability. Fearing India’s shield, China or Pakistan may consider pre-emptive salvos in a crisis, risking rapid escalation.
-
For the West: India’s reliance on Russian strategic air defence limits opportunities for U.S. and European suppliers of Patriot PAC-3 or SAMP/T NG systems. Moscow secures a critical anchor in its defence relationship with India.
-
For Nuclear Strategy: Long-range interceptors threaten bombers, tankers, and AWACS platforms essential for second-strike capability, nudging adversaries toward riskier hypersonic or unmanned solutions.
India’s pursuit of an expanded S-400 fleet — and its quiet ambition for the S-500 — marks a transformative moment in South Asia’s strategic environment.
By fusing Russian missile shields with indigenous systems like Akash-NG, Barak-8, and its nascent ballistic missile defence, New Delhi is erecting one of the most layered integrated air defence networks outside the U.S., Russia, and China.
