
The Thailand-Cambodia frontier has erupted into the most dangerous armed confrontation in over a decade, as the Royal Thai Armed Forces launched a dramatic and coordinated aerial and drone-led campaign against Cambodian military positions. The swift escalation comes amid renewed tensions over disputed territories and a growing body count that includes multiple civilian casualties.
Early Thursday morning, the tranquil but militarized borderlands of northeastern Thailand turned into a theater of high-stakes warfare. What began as scattered exchanges of small arms fire rapidly intensified into large-scale artillery duels and aerial bombardments. For the first time in years, Thailand deployed its American-built F-16 fighter jets in active combat roles alongside a fleet of domestically produced armed drones, signaling a profound shift in its military doctrine.
The unprecedented deployment saw drones carrying and releasing M261 and M472 mortar bombs with pinpoint accuracy. Combat footage released by the Royal Thai Army showed the drones operating in pairs, swooping over the dense jungle canopy and then unleashing their payloads on Cambodian artillery camps, weapons depots, and supply routes dangerously close to Thai territory.
“These Thai-made armed drones were able to identify and strike several high-value enemy targets, including weapons storage depots, rocket artillery staging areas, and mobile rocket launch vehicles, notably a fully loaded RM-70 GRAD system that was reportedly minutes from launch,” a senior Thai defence official stated under condition of anonymity.
One of the most significant drone strikes reportedly obliterated a Cambodian arms depot believed to house dozens of 122mm artillery rockets, dealing a severe blow to Cambodia’s offensive capabilities. The elimination of a live and loaded RM-70 GRAD launcher—a Soviet-era, 40-tube multiple rocket system—further underscored the tactical and symbolic potency of Thailand’s evolving aerial warfare capabilities.
The integration of drone strikes with manned fighter operations marks a decisive evolution in Thailand’s military posture. According to analysts, the deployment of unmanned systems demonstrates a shift away from traditional attrition warfare toward a precision-based, risk-averse strategy that leverages modern technology to avoid ground losses while achieving rapid battlefield dominance.
“This is a textbook example of modern air-ground integration in asymmetric border warfare,” said Dr. Chaiyan Wongsapat, a regional defense expert at Chulalongkorn University. “Thailand is signaling to both domestic and foreign observers that it is prepared to fight a 21st-century war.”
Thai military sources confirmed that the six F-16s deployed to the border included aircraft fitted with precision-guided munitions. One jet was involved in a surgical strike on a Cambodian staging ground after reports emerged that rocket launchers had been positioned within range of civilian populations.
The Thai Ministry of Defence has so far refrained from issuing a comprehensive public statement but emphasized that “all military actions were undertaken in strict adherence to rules of engagement and were designed to protect national sovereignty.”
Thursday’s hostilities broke out across at least six flashpoints along a 209-kilometre stretch of disputed territory, including areas adjacent to the infamous Preah Vihear temple. Initial reports from the Cambodian side, citing unnamed military officers, claim that their forces launched a preemptive night-time artillery barrage using RM-70 GRAD systems equipped with 9M22U or SHE-40 unguided rockets.
With a 20-kilometre range and 18.4-kilogram high-explosive warheads, these rockets are capable of delivering devastating area-wide effects. Thai authorities claim that these weapons were indiscriminately launched into Thai territory, resulting in the deaths of 12 individuals, including women and children.
“One rocket landed less than 300 meters from a school compound. The proximity of such attacks to civilian areas is unacceptable under any international humanitarian framework,” a Thai Ministry of Interior official told reporters.
Cambodia, however, accuses Thailand of provoking the escalation by fortifying military outposts in contested regions and deploying reconnaissance drones into Cambodian airspace without consent. A statement from Cambodia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the Thai airstrike as a “reckless and brutal act of military aggression.”
The growing violence has triggered widespread panic among residents living in the Thai border provinces of Surin, Sisaket, and Buriram. Thai education authorities have ordered the closure of at least 582 schools across these provinces as a precautionary measure.
Some school compounds have been repurposed into makeshift shelters to house displaced civilians fleeing artillery strikes. “We are doing everything we can to ensure the safety of our students and their families,” said a provincial education official in Surin. “Instructing schools to build fortified shelters and rehearse evacuation protocols is now a top priority.”
Thai local governments are scrambling to coordinate relief efforts, with medical units, food distribution centers, and trauma response teams dispatched to various municipalities.
“If this continues for another week, we’re looking at a full-blown humanitarian crisis,” warned a UNHCR field officer based in Ubon Ratchathani.
The current escalation follows a tense series of incidents stretching back to late May. A brief border clash left one Cambodian soldier dead, prompting both sides to heighten troop deployments. In early July, a Thai soldier lost his leg to a landmine near the Preah Vihear perimeter. Thai authorities accused Cambodian troops of planting the explosive—allegations that Phnom Penh has dismissed as “baseless and inflammatory.”
On Wednesday, Thailand dramatically escalated the diplomatic aspect of the conflict by expelling Cambodia’s ambassador and recalling its envoy from Phnom Penh. This reciprocal diplomatic freeze has thrown ASEAN-led mediation efforts into uncertainty.
According to Royal Thai Air Force insiders, the F-16s involved in the latest missions operated from Wing 1 Air Base in Nakhon Ratchasima, with aerial refueling support provided by KC-130s. All sorties were coordinated using satellite data and real-time drone feeds, ensuring that strikes were executed with minimal risk to civilians.
Although the Royal Thai Air Force remains tight-lipped on specifics, sources suggest additional assets, including Gripen fighters and air defense batteries, are on standby in case the conflict widens. Rumors persist that Python-5 and Derby air-to-air missile systems have also been loaded as a contingency for potential Cambodian aerial retaliation—though Cambodia’s air fleet is relatively modest in comparison.
Cambodian military sources say that despite Thursday’s setbacks, multiple RM-70 launchers have been repositioned along the border, particularly near Preah Vihear. Intelligence reports indicate that Cambodian military brigades have been redeployed toward frontline areas, with infantry and mobile artillery units establishing new forward bases.
Analysts worry that another round of artillery attacks could trigger a broader conflict spiral.
“This is not just a local border dispute anymore. The military posturing, use of air power, and regional instability make this a potential flashpoint for greater Southeast Asian insecurity,” said Laurent Ruel, a French military strategist specializing in ASEAN affairs.
The most recent flare-up comes at a time when ASEAN’s regional credibility is already under scrutiny due to its inability to resolve the Myanmar crisis and manage South China Sea tensions.
“ASEAN’s principle of non-interference and consensus-based diplomacy is simply inadequate for resolving hard-security issues like this one,” said Dr. Vannary Heng, a Cambodian political scientist at the University of Malaya. “Without strong external mediation or arbitration, we are on a dangerous path toward prolonged standoff or worse.”
Despite preliminary attempts by Indonesia and Vietnam to convene an emergency summit, neither side has signaled willingness to attend until current military operations conclude.
At the heart of the Thailand-Cambodia conflict lies Preah Vihear—a 900-year-old Hindu temple perched atop a cliff in the Dangrek Mountains. Though the International Court of Justice ruled in Cambodia’s favor in 1962, Thailand continues to contest ownership of the surrounding land. The site, now surrounded by heavily fortified positions, has been the source of bloody skirmishes in 2008, 2010, and 2011.
Preah Vihear’s symbolic weight—tied to national pride, historical sovereignty, and religious heritage—makes it one of the most volatile points of contention in mainland Southeast Asia.
“Every time domestic politics are unstable in either country, nationalist forces refocus attention on Preah Vihear,” Dr. Heng explained. “It’s a lightning rod for unresolved trauma.”
While the immediate prospects for ceasefire remain slim, diplomatic channels are reportedly still open behind the scenes. Thai military leaders have suggested the creation of a buffer zone, monitored by international observers, but Cambodia insists on full recognition of its sovereign territory first.
Meanwhile, Thailand is weighing whether to increase its drone operations or escalate air patrols near critical Cambodian positions. Defense insiders claim additional strikes may be authorized should rocket attacks persist.
In the absence of clear de-escalation signals, the region braces for the possibility of sustained conflict.