As Russia’s intensifying missile and drone barrages devastate Ukrainian cities, the spotlight is once again on Europe’s role in supplying critical military support to Kyiv. Germany has stepped into that spotlight with renewed urgency, as Berlin explores all possible channels to deliver additional MIM-104 Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine—systems that have become a cornerstone of the embattled country’s air defense shield.
Speaking to the press, German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius confirmed on June 30 that the federal government is evaluating “different ways” to acquire and transfer more Patriot systems. Options include direct procurement from the United States, repurposing systems from NATO stockpiles, and leveraging multilateral mechanisms for air defense aid. The initiative comes as Germany solidifies its position as Ukraine’s second-largest defense backer, having already provided three full Patriot batteries.
“Ukraine’s ability to defend its skies is a moral and strategic imperative for Europe,” Kornelius stated. “We are actively coordinating with allies to address this gap as swiftly as possible.”
The urgency behind Berlin’s moves comes amid troubling developments from across the Atlantic. Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Defense announced a pause in the delivery of 30 Patriot missiles to Ukraine, citing depleted U.S. stockpiles and the need to prioritize national defense readiness. The move raised alarm in European capitals, with fears that the reliability of U.S. military support could wane further, especially under the returning Trump administration—widely viewed as less committed to Ukraine’s war effort.
This sudden shortfall of interceptors threatens to cripple Ukrainian defenses at a time of escalating Russian air assaults. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius is now slated to visit Washington within weeks, where he will meet with Pentagon officials and U.S. defense contractors to secure faster production timelines and unlock emergency supply pathways. Pistorius is also expected to engage closely with the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, often referred to as the Ramstein Group, to coordinate the sourcing of surplus launchers, radars, and interceptors from other NATO countries.
The Patriot missile system—a product of U.S. firm Raytheon—is far more than just another asset in Ukraine’s arsenal. Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, two batteries from the U.S., three from Germany, and one full and one partial system from the Netherlands have been delivered to Ukraine. Romania has also pledged one of its batteries, though the timeline for transfer remains under negotiation.
This brings the total number of full systems delivered or pledged to at least seven, excluding additional launchers and interceptors provided via joint EU and NATO initiatives. According to defense officials, Germany is aiming to raise that number further, with a focus on rapid operational deployment before the expected escalation of Russian operations in late summer.
On July 2, 2025, Ukraine experienced one of the deadliest coordinated aerial attacks of the war. Over 100 missiles and drones rained down on Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, and Dnipro, targeting residential blocks, hospitals, power substations, and railway hubs. Ukrainian authorities reported at least 40 civilian deaths and hundreds of injuries, with emergency services overwhelmed by simultaneous strikes.
A senior Ukrainian defense official told local media that even with the Patriot and IRIS-T systems deployed, the sheer volume of simultaneous threats exceeded capacity, allowing several ballistic and cruise missiles to penetrate layered defenses. The attack underscored the dire need for expanded coverage and redundancy, especially against hypersonic and maneuverable missile threats.
Originally developed during the Cold War, the Patriot system has undergone significant modernization. It now serves as one of the few fielded systems worldwide capable of reliably intercepting ballistic missiles, including those traveling at hypersonic speeds.
Each Patriot battery includes:
-
A multi-function phased-array radar capable of tracking over 100 targets simultaneously.
-
Fire control and engagement stations.
-
Eight mobile launchers.
-
An array of interceptor missiles, most notably:
-
PAC-2 GEM-T, effective against aircraft and cruise missiles (range: up to 160 km).
-
PAC-3 MSE, optimized for ballistic missile defense (range: ~60 km, altitude: 24 km).
-
Patriot systems in Ukraine have already intercepted several Russian Iskander and Kinzhal missiles, according to NATO sources. One high-profile interception occurred in May 2023, when Ukrainian forces downed a Kinzhal missile over Kyiv—an event widely cited as the first known successful defense against a hypersonic projectile in active combat.
Ukraine has been rapidly integrating Western-supplied systems into a multi-layered air defense network designed to address a diverse array of threats—from Iranian-made Shahed drones to strategic bombers and cruise missiles. This network now includes:
-
Short-range: Gepard, NASAMS, Avenger.
-
Medium-range: IRIS-T SLM, SAMP/T.
-
Long-range: Patriot, S-300.
However, the Achilles’ heel remains coverage and depth. Many areas—particularly in southern and eastern Ukraine—remain unprotected due to the limited number of long-range batteries and missiles. Even Kyiv, where Patriot and NASAMS systems are heavily concentrated, suffered damage in the July 2 onslaught due to saturation attacks.
Military analysts argue that at least ten to twelve full Patriot batteries are needed to provide robust coverage of Ukraine’s critical infrastructure and population centers. This makes Germany’s renewed campaign to secure more Patriots a defining test of NATO solidarity and European strategic leadership.
With the United States’ shifting posture and the possibility of reduced defense aid under Trump, Germany has begun to assume an outsized role in sustaining Ukraine’s war effort. Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who assumed office in late 2024, has positioned Germany as the anchor of Europe’s military response to Russian aggression.
To date, Berlin has committed over €38 billion in military, humanitarian, and financial aid—second only to the United States. This includes:
-
Leopard 2 tanks.
-
IRIS-T air defense systems.
-
Artillery, ammunition, and battlefield drones.
-
Training for over 10,000 Ukrainian troops.
Merz has also called for the establishment of a European Defense Production Act, modeled on U.S. emergency procurement laws, to expand Europe’s arms manufacturing capacity, including interceptors for systems like the Patriot.
“Europe must prepare for the possibility that it will have to carry the burden alone,” Merz stated during a June speech to the Bundestag. “The defense of Ukraine is the defense of Europe.”
Germany is not alone in stepping up. Romania, a NATO member on the Black Sea front line, has pledged to transfer one of its four U.S.-made Patriot systems to Ukraine—a move that would mark the first donation of such a system by a frontline NATO country. While Bucharest is still negotiating the timeline, analysts say it demonstrates a rising Eastern European commitment to defend Ukraine not just politically, but militarily and materially.
Poland, meanwhile, continues to build one of Europe’s most advanced layered air defense systems and is reportedly considering releasing some interceptor stockpiles to Ukraine via multilateral arrangements. However, officials insist that Warsaw must prioritize its own territorial defense amid growing tensions with Belarus and Kaliningrad.
While political will appears to be strengthening, the hard limits of defense industrial capacity are already being tested. According to Bloomberg’s July 4 report, German and U.S. negotiators are pushing Raytheon to increase monthly production of PAC-3 missiles beyond the current 12-15 units per month. Meanwhile, Germany is exploring co-production deals and joint ventures with EU partners to license-manufacture select missile components.
To bridge the immediate gap, some NATO members are reportedly weighing whether to transfer batteries in reserve or training use, particularly those stationed in Southern Europe and Turkey.
Looking ahead, Ukraine’s ability to defend itself from Russian aerial attacks could determine the outcome of the war. Without sufficient air defense, even a successful counteroffensive could be undone by unrelenting strategic bombardment.
The July 2 strikes show that Russia is willing to escalate its use of long-range munitions to exhaust Ukraine’s defenses and morale. If Western systems fail to arrive in time—or in sufficient numbers—Ukrainian cities may become even more vulnerable, with profound humanitarian and geopolitical consequences.
As Germany scrambles to rally allies and organize supplies, the question looming over Europe is not just one of logistics, but of political resolve. Can the continent sustain Ukraine’s defense if U.S. support falters further? And can it do so quickly enough?
