Pakistan’s Propaganda Fails: Pakistan’s False Claim of Shooting Down Rafale Fighters During Indian Airstrikes in Kashmir

Rafale fighter jet

In the early hours of May 6, 2025, India launched one of its most audacious military operations in recent memory—Operation Sindoor. Targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, the Indian Air Force (IAF) executed precision strikes aimed at decapitating a string of militant networks allegedly responsible for repeated cross-border attacks in Jammu and Kashmir. The mission was fast, calculated, and high-risk.

However, what followed was a barrage of counterclaims, unverified images, and an intense information war that quickly overshadowed the tactical objectives of the strike. Islamabad claimed it had shot down five Indian aircraft, including three of the IAF’s crown jewels: Rafale fighter jets. The claim, made with little substantiation, sent shockwaves through military and political circles and fueled a raging online narrative war.

Pakistan’s military spokesperson was quick to announce the downing of Indian aircraft, asserting that all five jets were intercepted while still in Indian airspace. Among the claimed losses were three Rafale fighters, a Su-30MKI, and a Mirage 2000.

Social media exploded. Within hours, pro-Pakistan users began circulating images allegedly showing debris from downed Rafales. One such image purportedly came from Wuyan village in the Indian-administered Kashmir region. The photograph showed what looked like the crumpled remnants of an aircraft component lying near a school building. Claims that the wreckage included inscriptions from French company Le Bozec et Gautier and the acronym “RFL” (supposedly linked to Rafales) were repeated across posts.

But doubts quickly emerged. According to aviation and defense expert Xavier Tytelman, these claims do not hold water. Tytelman told France24 that the image shows a fuel drop tank—standard equipment on many aircraft, including older models. “These images are not proof that a plane was shot down. It shows a drop tank. When a jet goes on a mission, once it has used its fuel, it will lighten its load and drop its tank. It’s something planes intentionally release during their missions,” Tytelman explained.

Further analysis revealed the tank bore the acronym “RPL,” denoting “réservoir pendulaire large” or large pendular tank, common on Mirage 2000 jets and manufactured in 1984—well before the first Rafale flight. In short, the evidence Pakistan touted as proof was more likely a discarded part from an older Mirage 2000, not a freshly downed Rafale.

Adding to the fog of war is the possibility that a long-range air-to-air missile engagement may have indeed taken down an Indian jet. Sources within the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, notably defense analyst Ashley Tellis, suggest that one Rafale may have been lost to a Pakistani J-10C fighter armed with the Chinese-made PL-15E missile.

The PL-15E is a formidable weapon. With an operational range of 145 kilometers in the version supplied to Pakistan, it can target aircraft from a distance that stretches beyond visual range engagements. A French fighter pilot, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that such missiles remain undetectable until the final moments of impact. “It’s stealthy until its own radar goes active, just seconds or kilometers before hitting the target,” he said.

If true, this marks one of the first known instances of ultra-long-range missile engagement in South Asia. But such a claim remains speculative in the absence of physical proof—wreckage, flight logs, or pilot accounts.

Interestingly, India has not officially confirmed or denied the loss of any aircraft. Nor has Dassault Aviation, the French manufacturer of the Rafale jets, issued any comment. The absence of a formal acknowledgment has only fueled speculation, with analysts divided over whether India is exercising strategic restraint or managing a potential public relations crisis.

One possible explanation is the nature of modern military engagements. “Combat losses are a reality of any war,” noted Professor Amit Gupta, Senior Fellow at the National Institute of Deterrence Studies, USA. “What matters isn’t whether you lost a plane, but whether you achieved your strategic goals.”

Gupta contextualized the claims by drawing parallels to other conflicts. During the 1991 Gulf War, the U.S. lost 75 aircraft, including 28 fixed-wing jets and 23 helicopters, but still claimed a resounding victory. In the 1999 Kosovo campaign, NATO lost only two aircraft, yet the political fallout was enormous. In such scenarios, losses are evaluated not by numbers alone but by the mission’s broader success.

The information war surrounding Operation Sindoor is proving to be just as intense as the military operation itself. Pakistan moved quickly to seed global narratives, reportedly even engaging outlets like Al-Jazeera to propagate the story of an Indian female pilot being captured—a claim that was never substantiated and later disappeared from mainstream reporting.

“Islamabad got Al-Jazeera to announce that an Indian woman pilot had been shot down and captured, and this forced India to ask for a ceasefire,” Gupta said. “How difficult is it to put this officer on TV and to then tell Al-Jazeera that they are an incompetent and biased news outlet?”

This raises serious questions about India’s information management. In an era where perception often outpaces reality, controlling the narrative is as important as controlling the battlefield. Analysts argue that India needs a more robust strategy to counter disinformation and take ownership of the public story surrounding its military operations.

While official details remain sparse, multiple defense sources confirm that the mission involved a combination of Mirage 2000s, Su-30MKIs, and Rafales, all flying in coordinated attack patterns across multiple sectors. Strikes reportedly hit militant infrastructure in Neelum Valley, Leepa, and Bhimber sectors—long suspected to host camps operated by groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed.

Satellite imagery released by independent analysts post-May 6 showed scorched buildings and terrain disturbances in these regions, corroborating claims of air strikes. Unconfirmed reports also speak of up to 80 casualties among terror cadres, though these numbers have not been independently verified.

The complexity and ambition of the operation suggest high-level coordination between air and ground intelligence units, as well as strategic planning to minimize Indian losses. But the debate over whether one or more aircraft were shot down, and if so, by what means, continues to cloud the larger picture.

If even one Rafale was downed by a PL-15E, it marks a significant escalation in regional military dynamics. Pakistan’s acquisition of the Chinese J-10C platform, coupled with access to advanced air-to-air missiles, could tilt the balance of power—at least in terms of air-to-air engagements.

This is a close-up of the tank photographed in Wuyan on May 7, 2025. The acronym RPL can be seen on it. (Photo: X)
This is a close-up of the tank photographed in Wuyan on May 7, 2025. The acronym RPL can be seen on it. (Photo: X)

For India, this could spur urgent discussions around countermeasures, including deploying electronic warfare systems, enhanced radar jamming capabilities, and new-generation air-to-air missiles like the Astra Mk-2.

Moreover, the event could act as a wake-up call for both nations to upgrade their early-warning systems and redefine their rules of engagement. If air warfare is now entering a phase where engagements happen at 100+ km distances, doctrine and training must adapt accordingly.

Operation Sindoor has reignited familiar tensions, but it has also laid bare the evolving nature—where information, perception, and technology play equal roles alongside traditional firepower.

While it remains to be seen whether Pakistan’s claims hold water or crumble under scrutiny, the strategic intent behind India’s operation seems clear: a decisive show of force against cross-border terrorism. Whether or not India lost a Rafale, the larger question is whether it succeeded in degrading the terror infrastructure it set out to destroy.

For both nations, the real challenge now lies in navigating the fallout, deterring escalation, and crafting a narrative grounded in truth rather than propaganda. Because in modern warfare, winning hearts and minds may be as crucial as winning dogfights in the sky.

 

Related Posts